******************
Spoiler Warning *******************
When it was first announced that
Disney would be making three independent Star Wars films, I was unsure how to
take the news. A part of me feared this could be another Hobbit situation where
the studio was dragging out a franchise solely to make money, but when more
information came out about the film's story, including the news that Darth
Vader would be returning, my expectations grew (rebellions, it seems, are
not the only things built on hope). After the damage done by the prequels,
Rogue One has restored my faith in the Star Wars franchise in a way that even The Force
Awakens could not.
Characters/Acting
Jyn Erso (Felicity Jones): Overall
I enjoyed the character for what she was: a standard sci-fi/action role. Rogue
One had many more action scenes than The Force Awakens and dedicated less time to developing
its characters. Jyn Erso's weaknesses as a character can mostly be
attributed to the writers' decisions but not entirely (I think this sacrifice was justified, but
more on that later). Jones' was likable enough and I thought
her performance strengthened as the film progressed, but she did not captivate me
the way Daisey Ridley did with Rey or Carrie Fisher did with Leia. Both Ridley
and Fisher endeared themselves to me early on in their films in a way Jones
never did (especially Ridley). In the Story/Writing section of this film
I'll discuss why that not only worked for this film but made sense. On the
whole, Felicity Jones continued Star War's winning streak of casting strong
female characters but, like Natalie Portman, her performance was hampered by a
lack of development.
Cassian Andor (Diego Luna):
Although I thoroughly enjoyed K-2SO (or "K-2"), Cassian was my
favorite addition to the Star Wars universe. Unlike Jyn, the writers left more
room for Cassian to develop and Luna thrived off of the opportunity. If both
Cassian and Poe are supposed to resemble Han Solo as characters, this is a case
where Rogue One's character came out ahead (at least so far). Cassian's
willingness to kill Rebel allies for the sake of his mission brought some much
needed darkness to the light side of the force. Cassian's inner turmoil over
whether to kill Galen Erso gave him more room to grow as a character than Jyn's
more cliché and simplistic struggle with not wanting to get involved. It's no
surprise then that Cassian is the stronger character, though Luna's performance
was also above average and certainly worthy of mention.
Orson Krennic (Ben Mendelsohn): While
Director Krennic was not as formidable or intimidating a character as most Star Wars villains (lacking
a lightsaber, lightening hands, or a red/black face with horns) he was a
stronger character than most. In only a handful of scenes, Krennic proved to be
arrogant, irritable, ambitious, and merciless. Krennic's angry outbursts could
very easily have been overdone, but Mendelsohn exercised enough restraint to
avoid this all too common corniness (cough, Saw Gerrera, cough). The only real flaw concerning his role as a villain is that he was
overshadowed by the return of maybe the greatest villain of all time: Darth
Vader (or overall character in my opinion).
Story/Writing
My first reaction to hearing about
Rogue One was my fear that these standalone films might only serve as a money
grab for Disney. My second was "well,
every new character is certainly going to die". The decision to kill off all
of the main characters was necessary considering this film is meant to
immediately precede A New Hope. I've seen some reviews where audiences and
critics have criticized Rogue One for killing off all of its main characters. I
find these critiques baffling. Since none of these characters appear in A New
Hope (Jyn, Cassian, Krennic, the Rebel fleet admiral, etc.) their absence would
not make sense and any possible explanation for their non-involvement in the film
would seem implausible given each character's importance to their respective
cause. The decision to make a standalone film about stealing the Death Star
plans was creative and original--at least more so than The Force Awakens--even
if it meant a death sentence for its main characters.
Since the fate of all the new
characters was to be decided in this film, they did not have to develop as much
as characters in the other Star Wars films. Rogue One was more about the story
of capturing the plans than it was about the men and women who died stealing
them; the heavy dose of action scenes worked in Rogue One because the audience
was not meant to have too strong of an attachment to the characters (this is Star Wars and not The Deer Hunter after all). Had there
been a greater need for the characters to develop, dedicating the final quarter
of the film to a battle would have been to the detriment of the film (as it was
in Attack of the Clones). Instead, Rogue One is one of the few instances where
a liberal amount of special effects serves a purpose without compromising character development.
The first third of the film,
especially the parts on Jedha, were by far the slowest. Forest
Whitaker's portrayal of the paranoid general Saw Gerrera was somewhat corny and
rather forced. It also seemed unrealistic to me that a zealot like Saw would
not make more of an effort to escape the Death Star's attack on Jedha. Even
though he probably would not have made it to the ship due to his slow, robotic
legs, I would have thought his character would do more than simply resign
himself to his fate, especially considering he, justifiably, had doubts about Jyn's commitments to the Rebel cause.
Bor Gullet, Saw Gerrera's pink,
mind-reading monster, was easily the weakest scene in the film and felt extremely out of place. Why did
Saw subject Bodhi to a mind-reading monster and then throw him in a cell anyway
after his story was presumably confirmed? And did Bodhi really "lose his mind"
if he can regain it simply by being asked if he's the pilot? One could argue
that this scene's purpose was to show how irrational and paranoid Saw was, but
that would have been established well enough by the Scene where Saw is reunited
with Jyn. The Bor Gullet scene should have been cut on the editing floor.
The "cameos" by previous
Star Wars characters throughout the film were a small but significant addition
to the film. Keeping these appearances brief and plentiful was wise as it kept
the focus on the story at hand while spreading them out over the course of the
film.
The only cameo that possibly created
a non sequitur was C-3P0's observation that "they're going to Scarif?" Well, in order for the beginning to
A New Hope to make sense, C-3P0 must be aboard Leia's ship (Tantive IV), which
means he too would have been going to Scarif aboard Admiral Raddus's ship. This
can easily be explained as a mistake on C-3P0's part, but then why not just
have him say "We're going to
Scarif?"
George Lucas made what will
probably be his last positive contribution to a Star Wars film by allowing
Director Gareth Edwards to splice previously unused clips of Red Leader and
Gold Leader into the film. These scenes made perfect Easter eggs as they were
hardly noticeable nuggets which only true Star Wars fans would appreciate.
The scene where the Rebel fleet
shows up outside of Scarif was extremely well done and made good use of the old John
Williams' score. I haven't been so pumped up for a fight scene since The Charge
of the Rohirrim in Return of the King.
It took me a second viewing to warm
up to the characters of Baze Malbus and Chirrut Îmwe. It's no secret that Kung
Foo movies are not my favorite, so I was initially opposed to Chirrut's
character based on his battle with the Stormtroopers on Jedha. Upon
further consideration, however, I'll admit that the idea of having the Jedi temple
guarded by a Shaolin monk makes a certain amount of sense. In regards to
speculation I've seen from certain fans that Baze and Chirrut must be gay lovers (because obviously two male warriors have never been close in battle without being romantically in love), I'll say this: nope.
The Tarkin and Leia CGI scenes were
impressive and I think the right choice given that the alternative choice was
to find alternative actors. I thought the Carrie Fisher CGI was especially impressive while I had to adjust to the Tarkin scenes as the film progressed. Also, why all the pretend outrage over the morality of using CGI of a dead guy? Please go back to complaining about non-kale foods and leave Star Wars alone.
Darth Vader is my favorite character
of any narrative, whether the story be a book, movie, or oral poem. It was with
great anticipation therefore that I awaited his return to the big screen. My
already high expectations were exceeded by that final scene, a scene which I
may one day count among my favorite movie scenes of all time. As great as it
is to see Darth Vader use a lightsaber for the first time since Return of the
Jedi, it was the way the scene was shot that left me craving a second viewing.
And a third. And a fourth. Edwards gave us the Darth Vader that Star Wars fans know and
love, without any attempt to one-up previous Vader scenes. There were no
lightsaber acrobatics or excessive force choking. He just walks slowly and confidently
through the hall as he cuts a path through the Rebel forces like he always has, occasionally using
the force to throw troopers out of his way or disarm them. It was a brilliant
choice to have Vader appear out of the darkness by the glow of his lightsaber and
the whole scene perfectly echoed Vader's first introduction in A New Hope. For
a Star Wars fan this scene is reason enough to see Rogue One.
Conclusion:
A unique, creative backstory to the
Star Wars series and better than I could have hoped for from a
"standalone" film. Despite the weaker characters, I enjoyed Rogue One
even more than The Force Awakens, mostly because Rogue One had a unique plot. Despite
Rogue One's extensive use of CGI fight sequences, it will stand as an exception
to my usual critique of films without more character development. It's possible
that my grade too heavily reflects the film's ending rather than the film as a
whole, but I'd much rather a film end well and start slow than vice versa, not
to mention few films end as well as Rogue One does!
Grade:
WRAP: 85%
Author's Note: I've called this film a standalone Star Wars film because
others have done so before me, but it really isn't. Some, including the great
Mr. Plinkett, have criticized the film because it would not work without the
context of the other Star Wars films. It seems to me that they've entirely missed
the point. Rogue One is not meant to work outside the context of the other
films (as the film's conclusion proves).
No comments:
Post a Comment